This Year in LLVM (2025)(npopov.com)
26 points by asb | 0 comments
First screen, captured .
Looks similar
2025: The Year in LLMs(simonwillison.net)
823 points by simonw | 451 comments
Simon Willison's annual blog post reviewing major LLM trends of 2025, including reasoning models, coding agents, Chinese open weight models, and Gemini.
I Run LLMs Locally(abishekmuthian.com)
300 points by Abishek_Muthian | 183 comments
Things we learned about LLMs in 2024(simonwillison.net)
871 points by simonw | 530 comments
Simon Willison's blog post reviewing the major developments, themes and pivotal moments in large language models during 2024.
Related stories
2025: The Year in LLMs(simonwillison.net)
823 points by simonw | 451 comments
Simon Willison's annual blog post reviewing major LLM trends of 2025, including reasoning models, coding agents, Chinese open weight models, and Gemini.
Training LLMs from ground zero as a startup(yitay.net)
360 points by swyx | 92 comments
Yi Tay's blog post on the experience of training large language models from scratch at a startup (Reka), covering compute, infrastructure, and lessons learned.
LLMs and Programming in the first days of 2024(antirez.com)
355 points by nalgeon | 230 comments
Intended to be antirez's blog post on using LLMs for programming in early 2024, but the capture shows a Redis-branded 404 error page.
Things we learned about LLMs in 2024(simonwillison.net)
871 points by simonw | 530 comments
Simon Willison's blog post reviewing the major developments, themes and pivotal moments in large language models during 2024.
LLMs use a surprisingly simple mechanism to retrieve some stored knowledge(news.mit.edu)
336 points by CharlesW | 121 comments
MIT News article on research showing LLMs often retrieve stored facts via simple linear functions, and a technique to probe what a model knows about subjects.
AI tools are spotting errors in research papers(nature.com)
555 points by kgwgk | 200 comments
Nature news article on a growing movement using AI and large language models to detect errors in research papers, sparked by a flawed black plastic utensils study.