Looks similar
No, it doesn't cost Anthropic $5k per Claude Code user(martinalderson.com)
401 points by jnord | 292 comments
Blog post by Martin Alderson rebutting a Forbes claim that Anthropic's $200/month Claude Code Max plan consumes $5,000 in compute per user.
Mistakes engineers make in large established codebases(seangoedecke.com)
695 points by BerislavLopac | 307 comments
Blog post by Sean Goedecke on common mistakes engineers make when working in large, decade-old codebases with hundreds of contributors.
Software Pump and Dump(tautvilas.lt)
280 points by brisky | 113 comments
The lost art of XML(marcosmagueta.com)
97 points by Curiositry | 108 comments
Related stories
Your 'app' could have been a webpage (so I fixed it for you)(danq.me)
833 points by MrVandemar | 500 comments
Dan Q's blog post arguing that a travel company's mobile app for a school Disneyland trip should have been a webpage, and describing how he rebuilt it as one.
Anthropic bans 'abusive or cruel behavior' towards Claude(theverge.com)
21 points by mikelgan | 17 comments
The Verge report on Anthropic's usage policy update banning abusive or cruel behavior toward Claude and adding rules on propaganda, surveillance, and weapons.
Anthropic invests $1.5M in the Python Software Foundation(discuss.python.org)
329 points by ayhanfuat | 151 comments
A Python discussion forum post from PSF staff announcing Anthropic's $1.5 million, two-year donation to the PSF focused on security work.
The Eternal Sloptember(geohot.github.io)
347 points by razin | 280 comments
A blog post by George Hotz arguing that adopting AI coding agents in software development is a costly mistake because their output is subtly broken.
The cult of vibe coding is dogfooding run amok(bramcohen.com)
541 points by drob518 | 454 comments
Bram Cohen blog post arguing that the leaked Claude source code's poor quality reflects vibe coding dogfooding taken to cult-like extremes.
Don't fall into the anti-AI hype(antirez.com)
1090 points by todsacerdoti | 1334 comments
Blog post by antirez arguing that, despite his reservations, LLMs are going to change programming forever and people shouldn't dismiss AI out of hand.












