JPEG XL Test Page(tildeweb.nl)
220 points by roywashere | 145 comments
First screen, captured .
Looks similar
JPEG XL vs. AVIF for web use-cases(jakearchibald.com)
307 points by farlight | 195 comments
Jake Archibald's blog post comparing JPEG XL and AVIF image formats for web use, with examples and benchmarks, after JPEG XL landed in all major browsers.
Related stories
Google no longer automatically indexes websites?(natehoffelder.com)
532 points by c5karl | 447 comments
Blog post by Nate Hoffelder complaining that Google no longer automatically indexes websites, requiring manual submission.
google.com/goto: Google's anti-scraping update(autom.dev)
631 points by 1e1a | 488 comments
Autom blog post explaining that Google Search now rewrites organic result links to google.com/goto redirect URLs, affecting scrapers.
Goodbye Google(robert.ocallahan.org)
165 points by Murmuring9087 | 175 comments
Personal blog post by Robert O'Callahan titled "Goodbye Google", apparently announcing his departure from Google.
Googler... ex-Googler(nerdy.dev)
836 points by namukang | 747 comments
Personal blog post by Adam Argyle announcing his role at Google was eliminated and sharing his sadness and anger about the layoff.
Shipping JPEG XL in Chrome(developer.chrome.com)
551 points by AshleysBrain | 368 comments
Chrome for Developers blog post announcing JPEG XL support in Chrome, using a new Rust-based decoder (jxl-rs), with notes on performance and the Interop Project.
Chrome again exempts Google from user site data settings(lapcatsoftware.com)
508 points by ExMachina73 | 89 comments
Jeff Johnson's blog post reporting that Chrome 152 again exempts Google-owned sites from the user setting to delete site data, six years after a similar bug.