First screen, captured .
Looks similar
Gravitational-wave detector LIGO is back(nature.com)
144 points by gmays | 80 comments
A new era for Arecibo(nature.com)
135 points by gmays | 91 comments
Superconductor news: What’s claimed, and how strong the evidence seems to be(science.org)
1142 points by etiam | 450 comments
Derek Lowe's In the Pipeline blog post on Science.org discussing claims of a room-temperature superconductor and assessing the strength of the evidence.
Related stories
Superconductor news: What’s claimed, and how strong the evidence seems to be(science.org)
1142 points by etiam | 450 comments
Derek Lowe's In the Pipeline blog post on Science.org discussing claims of a room-temperature superconductor and assessing the strength of the evidence.
LK-99: The live online race for a room-temperature superconductor(forums.spacebattles.com)
489 points by fofoz | 492 comments
A SpaceBattles forum thread discussing claims of the LK-99 room-temperature, ambient-pressure superconductor and the online efforts to replicate it.
A New Experiment Meta-Strategy(chillphysicsenjoyer.substack.com)
26 points by surprisetalk | 1 comments
A Substack post by an amateur physicist describing a new strategy for doing home experiments after reorganizing a messy lab to fit limited free evenings.
LLMs use a surprisingly simple mechanism to retrieve some stored knowledge(news.mit.edu)
336 points by CharlesW | 121 comments
MIT News article on research showing LLMs often retrieve stored facts via simple linear functions, and a technique to probe what a model knows about subjects.
A room-temperature superconductor? New developments(science.org)
1158 points by nneonneo | 735 comments
Derek Lowe's In the Pipeline blog post on Science.org (Aug 2023) discussing new developments around the claimed room-temperature superconductor LK-99.
Deep learning gets the glory, deep fact checking gets ignored(rachel.fast.ai)
549 points by chmaynard | 134 comments
Rachel Thomas blog post on how a high-profile Nature paper using a Transformer to predict enzyme functions contained many errors that received far less attention than the original result.